Mary Francis Skeptical About Verne Garde’s Appointment

The content originally appeared on: St. Lucia Times News

Human Rights advocate Mary Francis has expressed skepticism regarding the appointment of Verne Garde as Acting Commissioner of Police (CoP), referring to it as ‘window dressing’.

“The Prime Minister does lots of things for window dressing and to use his words, this is just flashing mirrors,” Francis, the National Centre For Legal Aid and Human Rights Executive Director, told St. Lucia Times.

Garde’s initial contract is for six months.

On Monday, he officially succeeded Saint Lucia’s first female Police Commissioner, Crusita Descartes-Pelius, whose tenure ended on Saturday.

However, Mary Francis questioned what Descartes-Pelius had accomplished and what  Garde would do.

She asserted that the authorities are not addressing the root causes of crime and violence.

“Putting Verne Garde to my mind, I am not sure will solve the problem. To my mind, it is going to cause more division in the police force,” the outspoken Attorney at Law stated.

“What about other police officers with sufficient seniority and who are able also to perform the role? They have been bypassed,” Francis noted.

Francis declared that there’s too much politics in the public service, which she felt has lost its neutrality.

She told St. Lucia Times there should be a standard procedure where all who qualify can apply for the top cop post, with the Public Service Commission choosing the most competent one.

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate.
St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.