Local News

UWP to Continue CIP Investigation Despite Withdrawal of U.S Lawsuit

19 December 2024
This content originally appeared on St. Lucia Times.
Promote your business with NAN

The Opposition United Workers’ Party (UWP) says it will continue to push for answers from the government regarding the governance of the island’s Citizenship by Investment Programme (CIP), despite the withdrawal of a lawsuit in the United States against the Citizenship by Investment Unit (CIU).

The UWP’s first deputy leader, Guy Joseph insists there are still unanswered questions.

Despite threatening to expose evidence of corruption within CIPs in the region, Philippe Martinez, a developer based in St. Kitts, dropped the lawsuit filed in the U.S. federal court in which he alleged misconduct on the part of the Unit and named its CEO Mc Claude Emmanuel as a respondent. Reacting to that development, the Citizenship by Investment Board earlier this week said there had been a “failed attempt to threaten, embarrass, and extort” it, alleging that there had been last-minute attempts for a financial settlement, which it rejected.

Joseph says the UWP will continue pursuing the matter until the party gets definitive answers.

“There is a lot more that will be revealed in the new year,” he declared as he suggested there was more amiss in Martinez’s withdrawal of the lawsuit.

“I agree with Mr. Martinez. That’s not his case to fight. This is a case for Saint Lucia to fight and it is the commitment of this United Workers’ Party that we will do what is necessary to find where this money is.” 

UWP Public Relations Officer, Lenard Spider Montoute, said the Opposition wanted to know where monies earned from CIP citizenship sales go. It is demanding full transparency from the government.

Montoute called for details of the CIP contract signed with Galaxy.

“We want direct, definitive answers from our government,” he insisted.

The UWP official said the party was willing to take legal action to get those answers: “If it has to be that the matter has to go to court for us to get answers, then so be it. But I am saying as a citizen of this country, I should not have to take my government to court for them to account to me.” 

Any third-party or user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries published on the St. Lucia Times website (https://stluciatimes.com) in no way convey the thoughts, sentiments or intents of St. Lucia Times, the author of any said article or post, the website, or the business. St. Lucia Times is not responsible or liable for, and does not endorse, any comments or replies posted by users and third parties, and especially the content therein and whether it is accurate.
St. Lucia Times reserves the right to remove, screen, edit, or reinstate content posted by third parties on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times (this includes the said user posts, comments, replies, and third-party entries) at our sole discretion for any reason or no reason, and without notice to you, or any user. For example, we may remove a comment or reply if we believe it violates any part of the St. Lucia Criminal Code, particularly section 313 which pertains to the offence of Libel. Except as required by law, we have no obligation to retain or provide you with copies of any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website or any other online platform owned by St. Lucia Times. All third-parties and users agree that this is a public forum, and we do not guarantee any confidentiality with respect to any content you as a user may post, or any other post or reply made by any third-party on this website. Any posts made and information disclosed by you is at your own risk.